Issue M

How to improve the effectiveness of our weed management efforts on non-resident and recreational lots.” [Problem Statement #19 in the survey]

By 22 to 15 the membership surveys favored acting on this problem. (Pro-change members score= 1.47). But the Comments received provided no specifics.

Because of the lack of clarity of a direction for potential change, this matter was passed by the Board to discussion at membership meetings.  Weed considerations are also part of Issue L.
NO VOTE NEEDED.

One thought on “Issue M”

  1. I’d be open to paying into a fund for non-residential lots to have one person or company responsible for spraying our lots vs all of us hiring one of people to do the job. There has to be some cost savings there and a more efficient and thorough process.

    Like

Leave a reply to Tyler Smith Cancel reply